(b) My article "The Principle of Energy Distribution" (in Hebrew) submitted to the Israeli Journal "Mada", on May 1969. It not accepted for publishing. The article used the "Developing Periodicity" from 1960 to explain the interactions between particles in physics. Years later I have noticed that some of my ideas in that article are used in the commonly accepted theories of others, probably without any connection to my ideas. Some of the ideas in the article may be of interest even today. For reading the Full Article "The Principle of Energy Distribution" (in Hebrew)in this site please click HERE.

(c) My article "Non-Existence of Time from the Physical Point of View" (in Hebrew), from 19 October 1969, was sent to Prof. Aharon Katzir, as my response to his wonderful public lecture about the internal clocks of living objects. In my article, I showed that from the Relativity Theory of Einstein one may deduce that time does not exist as a factor in Nature, especially not for a Photon which moves in the speed of light in vacuum. I have also suggested in that article to regard "changes" for describing "motions". Prof. Katzir answered in his kindly reply letter, from 29 December 1969, that he had found interest in my attitude. However, my idea was so unusual for those times that Prof. Katzir had regarded it as a philosophical idea, rather than a scientific one. Prof. Katzir, though, has noted that there is a connection between the philosophic time and the scientific time. The reply of Prof. Katzir brought me to the understanding that there is a long way to go before science will accept the idea that time does not physically exist. I decided that this is a task which I will have to do, probably all my life, but that humanity deserves to change its old attitude regarding the notion of time. Therefore, I have continued to develop the idea, as we shall see below. I am glad to tell that since those days, at the end of the 60s, science has moved forward a long way. Today, there are other scientists who thinks that time does not physically exist. For example, in September 1999 a book was published under the title "The End Of Time: The Next Revolution in Physics", by Julian B. Barbour. I could not reach the book itself but from his site in the Internet I understood he declares that time does not exist and that "motions" should be described by "changes". However, Mr. Barbour did only the first step, which I have started over 32 years ago on October 1969. There are many more logical steps ahead, as we shall see in the following ideas, regarding the non-existence of time and space and the many consequences I have deduced along my articles. For visiting the site of Mr. Barbour go to the page "Important Links" at the Navigator bar above.

To download the Article "Not Physical existence of Time" 1969,  and the reply of Prof. Katzir, go to the specific line at the bottom of this page.   

(d)  My article "Non-Existence of Time and Space" (in Hebrew), from September 1970, is a broadening of my previous article, "Non-Existence of Time from the Physical Point of View". The idea was simple: since time and space are connected via the equations of the Relativity Theory, deletion of time implies deletion of space. The broaden article was sent to Prof. Aharon Katzir, on 29 September 1969, and to famous Israeli physicists: Prof. Yuval Neeman, Prof. Yakir Aharonov and Prof. Nissan Zeldes (who was my lecturer in the Hebrew University of Jerusalem). Prof. Katzir did not responed. He was probably abroad at those years. (As we all deeply sorry, in 1972 Prof. Aharon Katzir was murdered by a Japaneas terorist in the Tel-Aviv airport, Israel, when he return to Israel). Prof. Aharonov told me he did not agree with the idea that time and space does not exist. However he suggested to me to study General Relativity. Therefore, I did the Master thesis in General Relativity and Cosmology. Prof. Neeman, who wrote an interesting article "The Arrows of Time" (in Hebrew) (1969), did not responded to my article. Prof. Zeldes returned the article with many notes. We had a long conversation on the subject. He also could not accept the idea that time and space does not exist. However, Prof. Zeldes asked me two important questions: If time and space do not exist, what does it mean for the science?  and what could become instead of time and space?  Moreover, not only that none of those three important physicists have accepted my idea, but neither of them had mentioned someone else who may suggest, at those days, to regard time and space as non existence from the physical point of view. Today there are other scientists who think that time does not exist, including the book mentioned above by Mr. Barbour from 1999 "The End Of Time: The Next Revolution in Physics". Anyway, the questions Prof. Zeldes asked have encouraged me to go into deep intellectual research of those aspects. Some of the following articles are the results of that research. Lastly I have received an important support in my theory about the Non-Existance of Time and Space. In view of this theory, there is no upper limit to the speed of entities.  There are expected physical entities that move faster than the speed of light in vacuum, c. In the issue of the journal Nature of 8 August 2002,p. 602, there is an article title: Black holes constrain varying constants". That article discuss the possibility that cosmological experiments shows that the speed of light is greater than c. Such a result may support my theory that Time and Space are not physical entities. For seeing the article of Nature got to the page "Important Links" in the Navigator bar above.  

To download the article "Non-existenc of Time and Space" 1970 (Hebrew), go to the specific line at the bottom of this page.

(e)  My article "Motion, Space, Time and Matter" (in English) was sent in 30 January 1972 to Dr. D.G. Whithrow from the Department of Mathematics, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London. This article was my response to a specific sentence in Dr. Withrows book "The Natural Philosophy of Time". In my article, I proceeded to the next step by using the concept of "motion" as an entity which might replace the needs in our mind to the concepts space and time. From the reply of Dr. Withrow of 21 Feb. 1972, it is clear that my idea was not familiar to him even in the philosophical point of view.

(f)  "The Oron Sea Theory" (OST) was initially developed by me since 1983. This theory is a direct continuation of the above theory "Non-Existence of Time and Space". The root of OST is the concept that if time and space do not physically exist - there is no meaning to the scales of time and space. Therefore, any phenomenon existing within a fluid may be analogous in all the other scales, including the scales of cosmology and the scales of sub-elementary substance particles, which I call the Oron Sea.  My first manuscript of OST (in Hebrew) submitted in 1983 to Prof. Nissan Zeldes from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The OST theory is the basis for my other articles, including the article "Remote Controllers for Creating Matter in Space" from April 2002. In the introduction of that article, I explain the successful forecasts I have done in OST regarding many physical phenomena, which have come true in recent years. See more about OST at the beginning of this page.


(g)   My article "Quark-Tree Model for Precise Determination of Quark Masses" (in English), was sent to Physical Review D on 17 December 1995 (No. SM5606D). This article was the first in a series of articles in Theoretical Elementary Particles physics, which I have developed during the years 1995-1998. The article not published due to technical reasons. The other articles written under the title: "Theoretical Particle Microscope" (TPM).  I submitted them to Prof. Yossi Nir from the Department of Theoretical Physics in the Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. In those articles I assume that the quark masses might be arranged in a geometrical series. The exact parameters of that geometrical series should be found in experiments. If they found, one may theoretically decompose each elementary particle into its quarks and gluons. TPM also enables the discovery of the most interesting correlations between families of elementary particles. Prof. Nir did not agree with my basic assumption regarding a geometrical series for quark masses. He suggested to me to learn deeply the technical details of the experiments and theories on the subject. Unfortunately, due to my preoccupation with the IAI lawsuit, I could not dedicate the time required for such studies. Anyway, the other articles in the series not sent for publishing. I am waiting to see if the intensive experiments  over the world, that aim to find the exact quarks masses, will justify my hypothesis regarding a geometrical series. If they do, my new TPM theory will be a very useful tool for elementary particles physicists. See more on this Article at the beginning of this page.

On 29 September 2003 I have sent the article on this issue to an important professional physics journal where I mentioned the new developments in this subject and show that my idea, geometric series of the quark masses, should regarded now very seriously. But the responce was that my article is too numerically and therefore they do not accept it for publishing.

(h)  The article "Remote Controllers for Creating Matter in Space", from April 23, 2002, submitted to science editors of big Newspapers for publishing. But was not published. See more about this Article at the beginning of this page.